ACCTN581-20S (NET)

Professional Development Capstone

20 Points

Edit Header Content
Division of Management
School of Accounting, Finance and Economics

Staff

Edit Staff Content

Convenor(s)

Lecturer(s)

Administrator(s)

: maxine.hayward@waikato.ac.nz

Placement Coordinator(s)

Tutor(s)

Student Representative(s)

Lab Technician(s)

Librarian(s)

: clive.wilkinson@waikato.ac.nz

You can contact staff by:

  • Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
  • Extensions starting with 4, 5 or 9 can also be direct dialled:
    • For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
Edit Staff Content

Paper Description

Edit Paper Description Content
Before you complete your university education this Capstone Paper will encourage you to think broadly about the role of Accounting in
society today and how can accounting education better meet the needs of the contemporary economy. It will help you develop critical
thinking skills. It will encourage you to think about how you will best fit in to the extant business world, whilst recognising that the
business world requires improvements in some areas. You must consider how to promote change in the most effective ways in order to
help create a ‘better’ business world, and society.
The influence of business practices on society grew hugely during the 20th century. In the latter half of the 20th century much effort
went in to growing business units and financial performance. Questions were raised about such stress on financial performance on
sustainability.
Many business organisations have recognised the need to meet overall sustainability and report on social and environmental
information. Social and environmental disclosures are mostly of a voluntary nature. Hence it is of interest to reflect on the purpose of
such reporting including the extent of reporting and how such reporting can be improved in the future.
As well as this the new era of software and automation is challenging the profession and it is important to think about where the future may take us.
Edit Paper Description Content

Paper Structure

Edit Paper Structure Content

The Paper provides a study of the purposes of business education and accounting in 21st century society. The influence of business practices on society grew hugely during the 20th century; this created many problems for humankind. In the latter half of the 20th century much effort went in to growing business units, and the profits which they made. Unfortunately, these practices started to threaten the natural environmental and societal well-being. It was suggested that the decision-making information that accountants provide to managers is too limited in scope and should be reconsidered. The contemporary economy and society also requires reflection on the nature and role of accounting. Hence the paper outlines the significance and status of reporting broadly including social and environmental aspects and asks you to reflect on the role of the profession and its ethical position.

Edit Paper Structure Content

Learning Outcomes

Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Students who successfully complete the course should be able to:

  • Identify and discuss the literature relevant to social and environmental reporting.
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Analyse the corporate social and environmental reporting of New Zealand companies.
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Identify issues with accounting education.
    Linked to the following assessments:
Edit Learning Outcomes Content
Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Assessment

Edit Assessments Content

Your final grade will consist of coursework marks with no final examination: Internal Assessment/Final Examination 1:0

There are four assessment activities. These are also advised in the Components required.

Edit Additional Assessment Information Content

Assessment Components

Edit Assessments Content

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam. The final exam makes up 0% of the overall mark.

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0 or 0:0, whichever is more favourable for the student. The final exam makes up either 0% or 0% of the overall mark.

Component DescriptionDue Date TimePercentage of overall markSubmission MethodCompulsory
1. Essay
13 Jan 2020
11:30 PM
20
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
2. Essay
20 Jan 2020
11:30 PM
20
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
3. Essay
3 Feb 2020
11:30 PM
30
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
4.  Essay
17 Feb 2020
11:30 PM
30
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
Assessment Total:     100    
Failing to complete a compulsory assessment component of a paper will result in an IC grade
Edit Assessments Content

Required and Recommended Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Required Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Paper Reading List Link

Essay 1:

For this first Essay use your experience, prior learning, general reading and Google!

Essay 2:

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of ManagementReview, 14(1), 57-74.

Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 263-284.

Cunliffe, A. L., & Luhman, J. T. (2012). Agency theory, SAGE Key Concepts series: KeyConcepts in OrganizationTheory (1st ed., pp. 192). UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory thatmoves us. Journal ofManagement, 34(6), 1152-1189.

An, Y., Davey, H., & Eggleton, I. R. (2011). Towards a comprehensive theoretical framework for voluntary IC disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 571-585.

Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of TheoreticalAccounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.

Cotter, J., Lokman, N., & Najah, M. M. (2011). Voluntary disclosure research: which theory is relevant? Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 6(2), 77-95.

Essay 3

1. Corporate Governance in New Zealand: Principles and guidelines

Publisher: Financial Markets Authority

https://fma.govt.nz/assets/Reports/_versions/10539/180228-Corporate-Governance-Handbook-2018.1.pdf

2. FMA Corporate Governance Handbook 2018- Summary of submissions

Publisher: Financial Markets Authority

https://fma.govt.nz/assets/Consultations/180227-Corporate-governance-handbook-submissions-report.pdf

3. New NZX Corporate Governance Code – what listed companies need to know

https://www.simpsongrierson.com/articles/2017/new-nzx-corporate-governance-code-what-listed-companies-need-to-know

4. The Essentials of being a Director

Publisher: Institute of Directors and Financial Markets Authority

https://www.iod.org.nz/Portals/0/Publications/IoD%20FMA%20Director%20Essentials.pdf?ver=2018-09-13-130337-210

5. http://www.nzcgf.org.nz/

For further reference you may wish to read

Corporate Governance Statement 2018- (Contact, Scales Corporation, etc.)

https://scalescorporation.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Corporate-Governance-Statement.pdf

Essay 4

Crowther, D. (2004). Corporate social reporting: genuine action or window dressing. Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, 140-160.

Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253-261.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2010). Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? Journal of World Business, 45(4), 375-384.

Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. L. (2006). Corporate sustainability accounting: a nightmare or a dream coming true? Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 293-295.

Lin, L.-W. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in China: Window dressing or structural change. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28, 64.

Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3-41.

Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business & Society, 44(4), 377-41

Edit Required Readings Content

Online Support

Edit Online Support Content
Moodle Paper
Edit Online Support Content

Workload

Edit Workload Content
On-line submission of assessment items.
Edit Workload Content

Linkages to Other Papers

Edit Linkages Content

Prerequisite(s)

Prerequisite papers: ACCT572 or ACCTN572, ACCT573 or ACCTN573, ACCT574 or ACCTN574 and ACCT575 or ACCTN575

Corequisite(s)

Equivalent(s)

Restriction(s)

Restricted papers: ACCT581

Edit Linkages Content