MNMGT581-20A (HAM)

Research Methods in Management Studies

30 Points

Edit Header Content
Division of Management
PVC's Office

Staff

Edit Staff Content

Convenor(s)

Lecturer(s)

Administrator(s)

: denise.martin@waikato.ac.nz

Placement/WIL Coordinator(s)

Tutor(s)

Student Representative(s)

Lab Technician(s)

Librarian(s)

: nat.enright@waikato.ac.nz
: yilan.chen@waikato.ac.nz

You can contact staff by:

  • Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
  • Extensions starting with 4, 5, 9 or 3 can also be direct dialled:
    • For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 3: dial +64 7 2620 + the last 3 digits of the extension e.g. 3123 = +64 7 262 0123.
Edit Staff Content

Paper Description

Edit Paper Description Content

This paper introduces students to a range of methods for undertaking research in the social sciences, including interpretivist and positivist methods.The paper introduces students to the conceptual and methodological skills needed to think and perform as researchers.The required competencies are developed through the generation of a research proposal and subsequent report in a field of interest tot he student and critiques of methodological approaches found in the academic literature. At the end of the semester, students will be required to submit a research proposal in their area of interest addressing all steps in the research process, viz. generation of a research question,literature review,choosing an appropriate method to answer the question, and descriptions of proposed methods of data collection and data analysis.

Key objectives of the paper include:

1.To acquaint students with the methods of research in management studies;

2.To educate students in the theory­-centred elements of research methods, providing them with an appreciation of how theories are developed and tested;

3.To familiarise students with a broad repertoire of research methods;

4.To apply different methods in a real research project;and

5.To develop the ability to critically evaluate published research.

Edit Paper Description Content

Paper Structure

Edit Paper Structure Content

The formal part of the course consists of in-­class learning,seminars,and discussion. The emphasis is on in-class discussion and sharing of ideas and experiences .Students are expected to have read the recommended readings. For domain ­specific knowledge, students are encouraged to contact their department. In this course, the lecturers will give advice primarily on methods issues.

The paper outline identifies the lecturer who will take the lead for each section but expect a range of participants to be involved.

It is expected students will always be ready to participate and provide both questions and ideas.

Edit Paper Structure Content

Learning Outcomes

Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Students who successfully complete the paper should be able to:

  • Understand
    Understand how to design a research project and be able to discuss general frameworks for and approaches to research.
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Perform
    Be able to perform a comprehensive literature review of a chosen area of research
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Critical Analysis

    Critically read and evaluate published research; be able to critically analyze the comparative strengths and weaknesses of different research strategies for a given research question

    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Understand the Research Process

    Understand the research process and the literature, tools and techniques associated with each phase of the process from library research through objective specification, topic analysis, hypothesis formulation, selection of the research strategies and design, data collection, and analysis, to the preparation of publishable research reports.

    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Discipline Familiarity
    Have a familiarity with important issues and papers, past and current, in their fields.
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Ethics and Referencing
    Comply with academic research ethics and referencing standards.
    Linked to the following assessments:
Edit Learning Outcomes Content
Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Assessment

Edit Assessments Content

Assessment Components

Edit Assessments Content

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam. The final exam makes up 0% of the overall mark.

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0 or 0:0, whichever is more favourable for the student. The final exam makes up either 0% or 0% of the overall mark.

Component DescriptionDue Date TimePercentage of overall markSubmission MethodCompulsory
1. Preliminary Research Topic Paper Review
17 Mar 2020
5:00 PM
10
  • Email: Convenor
2. Annotated Bibliography
31 Mar 2020
5:00 PM
15
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
3. Seminar
5 May 2020
5:00 PM
10
  • In Class: In Lecture
4. Take Home Test: Case Study in Management Research
4 Jun 2020
5:00 PM
25
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
5. Management Research Proposal
26 Jun 2020
5:00 PM
25
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
6. Final Quiz
23 Jun 2020
No set time
15
  • Other: Online via Moodle
Assessment Total:     100    
Failing to complete a compulsory assessment component of a paper will result in an IC grade
Edit Assessments Content

Required and Recommended Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Required Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Reading List Link

All readings are available online through the University Library's website. More readings will be informed during the course of the semester.

  1. Saunders, Mark; Lewis, Philip and Thornhill, Adrian (2016) Research Methods for Business Students, 7ed, ISBN: 978-1-292-01665-8, Pearson Education Limited
  2. Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices.
  3. Ariff, M. I. M., Milton, S. K., Bosua, R., & Sharma, R. (2011). Exploring The Role Of ICT In The Formation Of Transactive Memory Systems In Virtual Teams Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
  4. Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research: Sage.
  5. Hope, T., Chew, E., & Sharma, R. (2017). The Failure of Success Factors: Lessons from Success and Failure Cases of Enterprise Architecture Implementation [Best Paper Nominee]. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research.
  6. Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005). A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 388-400.
  7. Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and “problematizing” in organizational studies. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023-1062.
  8. MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validity assessment in behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293-334.
  9. Rivard, S. (2014). Editor's Comments: The Ions of Theory Construction. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), iii-xiii.
  10. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International journal of research in marketing, 19(4), 305-335.
  11. Sharma, R., Yetton, P. W., & Zmud, R. W. (2008). Implementation Costs of IS-Enabled Organizational Change. Information and Organization, 18(2), 73-100. doi:doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2007.09.001
  12. Straub, D. (2009a). Creating Blue Oceans of Thought Via Highly Citable Articles. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), iii-vii.
  13. Straub, D. (2009b). Why Top Journals Accept Your Paper. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), iii-x.
  14. Suddaby, R. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 346-357.
  15. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
Edit Required Readings Content

Online Support

Edit Online Support Content
All course materials are available through Moodle.
Edit Online Support Content

Workload

Edit Workload Content

This is a 500 level course, and the 30 points represents approximately 300 learning hours on the part of the students. This course runs over 13 weeks, students are expected to put in at least 25 hours per week of learning effort over the duration of the course.

Edit Workload Content

Linkages to Other Papers

Edit Linkages Content
The intention of this course is to get you going on your masters or PhD dissertation or thesis. That is, the proposal written for this paper can serve as the basis for your thesis or dissertation to start in the course taken after MNGT 501. You should thus be able to hit the ground running in the semester following this course.
Edit Linkages Content

Prerequisite(s)

Corequisite(s)

Equivalent(s)

Restriction(s)

Restricted papers: MNGT501

Edit Linkages Content