SOCIO303-19B (NET)

Technologies, Algorithms and Social Life

15 Points

Edit Header Content
Division of Arts Law Psychology & Social Sciences
School of Social Sciences
Sociology and Social Policy

Staff

Edit Staff Content

Convenor(s)

Lecturer(s)

Administrator(s)

: rachel.gosnell-maddock@waikato.ac.nz

Placement Coordinator(s)

Tutor(s)

Student Representative(s)

Lab Technician(s)

Librarian(s)

: jillene.bydder@waikato.ac.nz

You can contact staff by:

  • Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
  • Extensions starting with 4, 5, 9 or 3 can also be direct dialled:
    • For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 3: dial +64 7 2620 + the last 3 digits of the extension e.g. 3123 = +64 7 262 0123.
Edit Staff Content

Paper Description

Edit Paper Description Content
The purpose of this paper is to advance a sociological analysis of emergent technologies around the 'internet of things' and the social relations it engenders. In a series of speculative books Marshall McLuhan (1962, 1964, 1967, 1968) anticipated an electronic age, a Marconi to replace the Gutenburg Galaxy. While his use of diffuse terminology undermined precision at the same time as it facilitated conjecture, it can be argued that much of what he anticipated has come to pass. Indeed, the Internet as Web 2.0 appears as a mature / stable assemblage with users in those areas of the world with access to it spending around a quarter of their lives ‘online’. This fraction is increasing. Furthermore, this new realm of social relations is not limited to the virtual world, some would describe this new materiality as the immanent aspect of Web 3.0; rather the boundary between it and the non-virtual is increasingly interpolated. Consequently, the Internet of things, the increasing role algorithms and other non-human actors in decision-making, telepresence, ‘the military industrial surveillance complex’ (Fuchs, 2017) are important drivers that a contemporary sociology must address.
Edit Paper Description Content

Paper Structure

Edit Paper Structure Content
This paper uses flipped teaching. I have moved lecture content from face-to-face class time to online resources. We will discuss the lecture / online content in tutorials. The aim of flipped teaching is to be more student focused. You are expected to have read the online material in advance of our tutorials, and be well prepared to contribute by raising questions, answering questions, and making links between scholarly theory and examples and everyday life. Flipped teaching is challenging and I believe more rewarding.
Edit Paper Structure Content

Learning Outcomes

Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Students who successfully complete the course should be able to:

  • Learning Outcomes
    1. Understand key sociological perspectives relating to new forms of social relations facilitated by the rise of the Web 2.0 internet, the ‘Internet of things’ and the increasing role of algorithms.
    2. Appreciate and analyse how these new technologies, including forms of non-human agency, impact on decision-making in their lifeworld.
    3. Develop a critical understanding of power relations, class, gender and race inequalities, collective/group experiences and social institutions in terms of the Internet of things.
    4. Discuss the retrospect and prospect of sociological analysis around the socio-technical assemblages typically labelled the Internet.
    Linked to the following assessments:
Edit Learning Outcomes Content
Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Assessment

Edit Assessments Content

Students will be assessed principally through their ability to compose critical scholarly essays and complete a test.

Edit Additional Assessment Information Content

Assessment Components

Edit Assessments Content

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam. The final exam makes up 0% of the overall mark.

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0 or 0:0, whichever is more favourable for the student. The final exam makes up either 0% or 0% of the overall mark.

Component DescriptionDue Date TimePercentage of overall markSubmission MethodCompulsory
1. Essay 1
2 Sep 2019
6:00 PM
33
  • Email: Convenor
2. Essay 2
7 Oct 2019
6:00 PM
33
  • Email: Convenor
3. Test
18 Oct 2019
6:00 PM
34
  • Email: Convenor
Assessment Total:     100    
Failing to complete a compulsory assessment component of a paper will result in an IC grade
Edit Assessments Content

Required and Recommended Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Required Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

1. The Internet of Things

Greengard, S. 2018. The Internet Changes Everything. The Internet of Things. The MIT Press, pp. 1-25.

Swan, M. 2012. Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, (1), pp. 217-253.

The Editorial Team, 2018. How Wearable Technology Will Change the Internet, available at https://www.whoishostingthis.com/blog/2014/10/24/wearable-tech-internet/, accessed 1 June, 2019.

Baudrillard, J., 1983. The precession of simulacra. New York.

2. Platform capitalism

Srnieck, N. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Platform Capitalism. Polity Press, pp. 36-92.

Condit, J. 2018. Google will always do evil. Available at https://www.engadget.com/2018/05/24/google-will-always-do-evil/, accessed 1 June, 2019.

3. Problems for jurisdictions: Facebook and Uber

Mastrorillo, E. 2016. Getting Taken for a Ride by Uber Technologies Incorporated Sociological Imagination, Western’s Undergraduate Sociology Student Journal, 5(1), Article 4, pp. 1-8.

Fuchs, C. 2017. Facebook: Surveillance in the Age of Edward Snowden. Social media: A critical introduction. Sage, pp. 183-215.

Roy, E. 2019. Facebook are 'morally bankrupt liars' says New Zealand's privacy commissioner, The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/apr/08/facebook-are-morally-bankrupt-liars-says-new-zealands-privacy-commissioner, accessed 1 June, 2019.

4. Technological rationality and / or is the Internet making us stupid?

Marcuse, H. 1941. Some Social Implications of Modern Technology. Studies in Philosophy and Social Sciences. IX, pp. 138-163.

Marcuse, H. 2002 [1964]. The New Forms of Control. In One Dimensional Man: Studies in the ideologies of advanced industrial society. Routledge, pp. 3-20.

Carr, N. 2008. Is Google making us stupid? Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 107(2), pp. 89-94.

Fisher, M. 2009. Marxist Supernanny. In Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Zero Books, pp. 71-81.

Supernanny, 2015. Kids Don't Take Well to New Discipline in House. Available at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYvKWtEjDSM&list=PLMVobXGTPWIBucAcMPUngPHHq6-bouu1U&index=2, accessed 1 June, 2019.

5. Here come the drones: The military industrial surveillance complex

Curtis, N. 2016. The explication of the social: Algorithms, drones and (counter-) terror. Journal of Sociology, 52(3), pp.522-536.

Chan, M. 2019, The rise of the killer robots – and the two women fighting back, The Guardian. Available at:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/08/the-rise-of-the-killer-robots-jody-williams-mary-warehan-artificial-intelligence-autonomous-weapons, accessed 1 June, 2019.

Moore, J. 2017. Artificial Killing Machine. Available at:https://vimeo.com/131357384,accessed 1 June, 2019.

6. The message is the medium: Extensions of Human

McLuhan, M. 1964. The Medium is the Message. In Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Routledge, pp 7-23.

Harvey, O. 2006. Marshall McLuhan on Technology, Subjectivity and ‘the Sex Organs of the Machine World’. Continuum, 30(3), pp. 331-344.

Transition21, 2016. Narcissus Narcosis – Marshall McLuhan. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cMrWIvV4xc, accessed 1 June, 2019.

7. Big Data, algorithms and non-human actants

Callon, M. 1986. Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (Ed), Power, Action and Belief: a new Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 196-233.

Just, N., Latzer, M. 2017. Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. Media, Culture & Society, 39(2), pp. 238-259.

Lupton, D. 2015. A critical sociology of Big Data. In Digital Sociology. Routledge, pp. 93-116.

Levin, S. 2019. 'Bias deep inside the code': the problem with AI 'ethics' in Silicon Valley. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/28/big-tech-ai-ethics-boards-prejudice, accessed 1 June, 2019.

8. Artificial intelligence

Pilling, F., Coulton, P. 2019. Forget the Singularity, its mundane artificial intelligence that should be our immediate concern. The Design Journal, 22(1), pp. 1135-1146.

Vinge. V. 1993. The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-Human Era, Available at: https://edoras.sdsu.edu/~vinge/misc/singularity.html, accessed 1 June, 2019.

PierreRocket, 2016. 7 Days of Artificial Intelligence. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRdcZSuCpNo, accessed 1 June, 2019

9. The rise of China

Fuchs, C. 2016. Baidu, Weibo and Renren: the global political economy of social media in China, Asian Journal of Communication, 26(1), pp. 14-41.

Inkster, N. 2019. The Huawei Affair and China's Technology Ambitions. Survival, 61(1); pp. 105-111.

The Economist, 2018. China: facial recognition and state control. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lH2gMNrUuEY, accessed 1 June, 2019.

10. Bitcoin

Nakamoto, S. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, accessed 1 June, 2019.

Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B. and Moore, T. 2015. Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), pp.213-38.

Corradi, F. and Höfner, P. 2018. The disenchantment of Bitcoin: unveiling the myth of a digital currency. International Review of Sociology, 28(1), pp.193-207.

Dodd, N, 2018. The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, culture & society, 35(3), pp.35-56.

Various, 2014, Declaration of Bitcoin’s Independence. Available at:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQqZ9b0S0BY, accessed 1 June, 2019.

11. The crisis of sociology

Edwards, A., Housley, W., Williams, M., Sloan, L. and Williams, M. 2013. Digital social research, social media and the sociological imagination: surrogacy, augmentation and re-orientation, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(3), pp. 245-260.

Savage, M. and Burrows, R., 2007. The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), pp. 885-899.

Savage, M., 2017. Sociology and the digital: A response to Alphia Possamai-Inesedy and Alan Nixon. Journal of Sociology, 53(4), pp.885-886.

12. What a disappointment: Where’s my jetpack?

Graeber, D. 2012. Of flying cars and the declining rate of profit. The baffler, pp. 19, 66-84.

Wilson, D. 2007. Jetpack. In Where’s My Jetpack?: A Guide to the Amazing Science Fiction Future That Never Arrived. Bloomsbury, pp. 15-21.

Smithsonian Channel, 2015. The Strange History of the Jet Pack, and Where It's Heading’. Available at :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNUppNTT9RI, accessed 1 June, 2019.

Edit Required Readings Content

Online Support

Edit Online Support Content

Moodle will be used throughout the course.

If a notice is sent out via Moodle, it is assumed you will have received it. If material is placed on Moodle, it is assumed you have access to it. If, for any reason, you are unable to access Moodle, please advise Bruce Curtis.

Students are expected to utilise the material available on Moodle, but must also undertake the independent research to locate further appropriate material for assessments and other aspects of the paper. Reading a range of academic material relevant to the topic is crucial to adequately complete any assignment.

Edit Online Support Content

Workload

Edit Workload Content

This paper is worth 15 points. That implies that students will devote a minimum of 150 ‘learning hours’ to the paper. A full semester workload is 60 points. Therefore, students taking this course must expect to undertake a workload equivalent of around 25% of a full time load for one semester; that is about 10 hours a week for the whole semester (i.e. through to the end of study week). Assessment will be based on the assumption that students have devoted a minimum of 150 hours to the paper.

Edit Workload Content

Linkages to Other Papers

Edit Linkages Content

Prerequisite(s)

Prerequisite papers: 15 points in either Sociology or Social Policy or Screen and Media Studies.

Corequisite(s)

Equivalent(s)

Restriction(s)

Edit Linkages Content